Namoratunga
Dated by its excavators to about 300 BCE; the date is disputed
West of Lake Turkana, northwestern Kenya
Debated
A setting of 19 basalt pillars west of Lake Turkana, proposed in 1978 as an observatory for the stars of the Borana calendar. Later studies questioned both the star alignments and the date.

The site and the 1978 claim
Namoratunga is a set of standing stones in Turkana country, west of Lake Turkana in northwestern Kenya. At the site often called Namoratunga II, 19 basalt pillars stand in rows.
In 1978 the archaeologists B. Mark Lynch and Lawrence Robbins argued in Science that the pillars were not placed at random. They reported that lines through them point to the rising places of seven stars and star groups, among them the Pleiades and Sirius, the same ones the Borana Oromo use to name the months of their calendar. They dated the site to about 300 BCE and concluded that a calendar based on detailed knowledge of the stars was in use in eastern Africa more than two thousand years ago. They called it the first archaeoastronomical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa.
The doubts
The claim drew criticism quickly:
- In 1982 the archaeologist Robert Soper questioned whether the pillars had any astronomical purpose (Azania).
- In 1986 Laurance Doyle and Thomas Wilcox tested the alignments statistically, asking whether they were stronger than chance (Azania).
- The archaeoastronomer Clive Ruggles, reviewing the Borana calendar, questioned the link between the calendar and the Namoratunga pillars.
- The age is also in question. Pillar sites around Lake Turkana have since been studied in detail. At Lothagam North, a team led by Elisabeth Hildebrand showed in 2018 that the pillars mark a communal cemetery built by the region's first herders between about 5,000 and 4,300 years ago (Max Planck Institute). An older radiocarbon date from a pillar site near Kalokol has likewise been used to question the 1978 reading. A 2025 paper by Asfaw Beyene argues again that Namoratunga II was an observatory and gives an earlier radiocarbon date, but this has not yet been tested by other specialists.
Why it is labeled Debated
The pillars are real and old, and the Borana calendar is real and still in use. Whether this monument was built to watch the stars of that calendar has not been shown to most specialists' satisfaction. The wider pillar-site tradition around Lake Turkana is remarkable in its own right: it shows early herders working together to build lasting monuments for their dead.
Achievements
- 1978: Lynch and Robbins publish it in Science as the first archaeoastronomical evidence proposed for sub-Saharan Africa
- Part of a wider tradition of stone-pillar monuments around Lake Turkana
Related entries
Sources
- B. M. Lynch and L. H. Robbins, "Namoratunga: The First Archeoastronomical Evidence in Sub-Saharan Africa", Science 200(4343) (19 May 1978): 766–768 (Scholarly)
- Robert Soper, "Archaeo-astronomical Cushites: some comments", Azania 17 (1982): 145–162 (Scholarly)
- Laurance R. Doyle and Thomas J. Wilcox, "Statistical Analysis of Namoratunga: An Archaeoastronomical Site in Sub-Saharan Africa?", Azania 21 (1986) (Scholarly)
- Clive Ruggles, "Mursi and Borana Calendars", in C. L. N. Ruggles (ed.), Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy (Springer, 2015), 1041–1050 (Scholarly)
- Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, "Massive monumental cemetery built by eastern Africa's earliest herders discovered near Lake Turkana, Kenya" (on Hildebrand et al., PNAS, 2018) (Reference)
Suggest a correction: opens once the database is connected.